This review concerns itself with OCA marking process and feedback system. More specifically, what am I going to do to improve my over results. It is intended by reflecting on the process, and making corrections then the will improve and so will the overall mark.
Exploring Your Vision:
The marks have been returned, and I can say that while I understand what has been said, I am a little disappointed with the final result. Having said there are a number of comments given that don’t, on the surface seem to link to the work that I have submitted.
I will have to review the comments and marks and prepare SWOT analysis, this is process I have developed during context and narrative.
Perhaps I should do this before doing anything else, however, like EYV, the work load is constantly increasing, with more feedback from the tutor, and more about this later, catching up on Photographic exhibitions that I have not written up yet. It all seems a mass of work, and at time lacking in direction.
Assignment 2 Feedback:
Assignment 1 was submitted on the 30/5/17, the feedback came on the 1/7/17.
Assignment 2 was submitted on the 7/7/17, with little time to take on board the feedback from assignment 1. The feedback from assignment 2 was received on the 31/7/17. A prompt response in comparison to the first assignment.
The responses are very good, very detailed, and clarification is required, and as I am on holiday unable to make arrangements to discuss the work with the tutor, face to face. The response is also makes recommendations for further reading. While I understand that this is necessary, it is adding to the overall work load. This is causing me a little frustration. There are so many comments it is difficult for me to prioritise the elements that I need to work on first. I am sure it will become clearer with time.
Outcome I can control:
Prepare the swot analysis for EYV overall grades, and assignment two feedback, and then draw comparison with assignment 1 of C&N.
I am falling behind on this too.